Media Propaganda: Is the BBC Responsible for mRNA Vaccine-related Deaths?

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

Part I: Widow of BBC Presenter Who Died After COVID Jab Says “No Alternative” But to Sue Astra-Zeneca, by Tara Cobham, The Independent, April 11, 2023 (Excerpts)

Part II: Is the BBC Responsible for mRNA Vaccine-related Deaths?, by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, April 12, 2023


.

PART I

 

by Tara Cobham

The Independent, April 11, 2023

BBC Radio Newcastle’s Lisa Shaw had her first jab in May 2021 and died just a week later

The widower of a BBC presenter who died after having the Covid vaccine has said he has been left with “no alternative” but to sue AstraZeneca.

BBC Radio Newcastle’s Lisa Shaw had her first jab in May 2021 and died just a week later.

In August of that year, Newcastle coroner Karen Dilks ruled the 44-year-old had died from a rare condition associated with the jab that induces swelling and bleeding on the brain, “vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia”.

Her widower Gareth Eve said no one had “reached out” after he had attempted to “engage with the government, MPs and three prime ministers”.

He told the BBC:

“It’s not in my make-up to turn around and say I want to sue somebody but for almost two years we’ve tried to engage with the government and tried to engage with MPs since Lisa died and not one of them has reached out or engaged with us at all.

“Any engagement is fleeting at best so that’s the reason that we’re left with no alternative – if the government or AstraZeneca don’t want to engage with us then what else are we supposed to do?”

Mr Eve said he merely wanted “some sort of acknowledgement or recognition that these deaths have occurred”, adding: “We’re not crackpots or conspiracy theorists, we’re husbands and wives and family members who have lost somebody – that’s all it is.

Our thanks to The Independent.

Click here to read the complete article.


.

PART II

Is the BBC Responsible for

mRNA Vaccine-related Deaths?

BBC Propaganda in Support of the COVID-19 Vaxx   

by

Michel Chossudovsky

Global Research, April 12, 2023

Our thoughts today are with the family of the late BBC presenter Lisa Shaw.

***

Introduction

What the above report by The Independent fails to acknowledge is that Lisa Shaw’s employer, namely the BBC was instrumental in providing legitimacy to the mRNA “killer vaccine”, through 24/7 reports intimating that the virus was more dangerous than the vaccine. 

The BBC also withheld publication of official data pertaining to vaccine related deaths and adverse events, not to mention the outright censorship of prominent scientists and medical doctors. 

The BBC’s Fear Campaign: “Why is the Virus Such a Threat”

A couple of weeks prior to the official launch of the mRNA vaccine in early November 2020, the BBC featured a timely report entitled: 
 
“Why is the Virus such a Threat”.
 
The BBC describes (quoting and misquoting “scientific opinion”) how the virus had developed “a hit and run killer evolutionary tactic”, with a view to spreading the Covid-19 infection far and wide.

.

BBC “Scientific Nonsense”

The unspoken objective of this report by BBC Science Correspondent James Gallagher was to “scare the British public”, while indirectly promoting acceptance of the Covid mRNA vaccine.

The article was based on the “authoritative voice” of Prof Lehner of Cambridge University, an Infectious Diseases Physician at Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge:

“A simple virus has brought life as we know it to a screeching halt. 

We have faced viral threats before, including pandemics, yet the world does not shut down for every new infection or flu season.

So what is it about this coronavirus? What are the quirks of its biology that pose a unique threat to our bodies and our lives?

According to Lehner: In the early stages of an infection “the virus is able to deceive the body. … It [the virus] behaves like a ‘hit and run’ killer 

The amount of virus in our body begins to peak the day before we begin to get sick. …

But it takes at least a week before Covid progresses to the point where people need hospital treatment.

This is a really brilliant evolutionary tactic – you don’t go to bed, you go out and have a good time,” says Prof Lehner of Cambridge University. 

So the virus is like a dangerous driver fleeing the scenethe virus has moved on to the next victim long before we either recover or die. 

In stark terms, “the virus doesn’t care” if you die, says [Cambridge] Prof Lehner, “this is a hit and run virus”.  ….

It does peculiar and unexpected things to the body (BBC, James Gallagher, October 22, 2020, emphasis added) 

What rubbish! This frivolous BBC report personifies the so-called “virus that does not care”, with a view to creating panic, quoting the incautious statements of a Cambridge scientist, who’s on the payroll of Big Pharma’s Wellcome Trust.

In turn the “Hit and Run Virus” (rather than corrupt governments) is blamed for having “ordered the lockdown” (March 11, 2020), imposed on 190 countries, which has created economic and social havoc Worldwide.

Not only is this sensationalist report based on the results of the flawed PCR test —which does not detect the virus (ie. CoV-SARS-2), it is in blatant contradiction with the official WHO definition of Covid-19:

“The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, dry cough, and tiredness. … These symptoms are usually mild and begin gradually. Some people become infected but only have very mild symptoms. Most people (about 80%) recover from the disease without needing hospital treatment. Around 1 out of every 5 people who gets COVID-19 becomes seriously ill and develops difficulty breathing.”

According to both the WHO and the CDC, CoV-SARS-2 is not a dangerous virus. In may regards it is similar to seasonal influenza. 

What is really dangerous is the Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine, which is portrayed by the media as a means to combating the virus.

Deep-seated Crisis Within the BBC

Charlie Walsham (pseudonym) describes “How the BBC lost its way on Covid” (Spectator, December 19, 2021)

I have been a BBC journalist for many years, … My despair about the BBC’s one-sided coverage of the pandemic though has been steadily growing for some time. And in early December [2021], as I listened to a BBC radio broadcast, I felt the corporation reach a new low. 

During a morning phone-in show on 5Live the topic of discussion was Covid jabs and whether they should be mandated, or if punitive action should be taken against those who refuse them, such as imposing lockdowns on the unvaccinated. … I at least expected a balanced discussion.

This was wishful thinking on my part, as ‘Michael from Birmingham’ – a caller – was about to find out. Michael told the host he hadn’t been vaccinated because he didn’t trust ‘the data’ and cited historic incidents of documented corporate malfeasance by pharmaceutical giants to explain why he was concerned. … Yet instead of holding a reasoned debate with his concerned caller, the host immediately lost his temper, talked over Michael, implied he was a flat-earther and then muted him entirely.

It was an interaction that goes to the very heart of the dismal failure of BBC News. …The atmosphere in these BBC offices in the early days of the pandemic became comically oppressive.

… Before long, colleagues I respected, and who held sway over running orders, succumbed to the belief that lockdowns, social distancing and face coverings – the whole gamut of coronavirus measures – were the only viable route out of the crisis. Alternative strategies, even those backed by eminent scientists and medics, were dismissed as dangerous or the work of cranks without any effort being made to properly examine their ideas. …

 
Written by Charlie Walsham (Charlie Walsham is the pseudonym of a BBC News employee who has worked at the Corporation for several years. (emphasis added)
 

BBC Misinformation. “Pack of Lies”

In a February 15, 2022 report by Michelle Roberts, the BBC contends the following:

Will the vaccine give me side effects? 

Some people do experience mild to moderate symptoms after being vaccinated.[biased and nonsensical statement] This is not the disease itself, but the body’s response to the vaccine.

Common reactions that may affect more than one in 10 people and typically get better within days include chills, tiredness and aching muscles.

What about serious reactions?

It is rare to find that health problems occurring following a vaccine are actually caused by the vaccine itself. [absolute nonsense refuted by scientific evidence]. Events may be coincidental and unrelated to vaccination.

The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine has been linked to very rare cases of blood clots. This is not proof that the vaccine is to blame. [the incidence of blood clots resulting from the vaccine is amply documented] Covid infection itself can also make clots more likely and they can occur naturally too.

The chance of this happening to an individual is still extremely low,[Nonsensical statement] but as a precaution, younger age groups in the UK have been offered alternative Covid vaccines.


By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, April 10, 2023
 

 

The BBC Has Exercised Censorship. Its Statements in Support of the COVID Vaxx Are Misleading

The BBC has failed to inform the public regarding the recorded Covid vaccine related deaths and adverse events, confirmed by official data as well as scientific reports.
.

“Official sources, namely EudraVigilance (EU, EEA, Switzerland), MHRA (UK) and VAERS (USA), have now recorded many more deaths and injuries from the COVID-!9 “vaccine” roll-out than from all previous vaccines combined since records began.”

Moreover, not a word regarding the release of Pfizer’s Confidential report in October 2021 under Freedom of Information (FOI), which provides ample evidence (From the Horse’s Mouth) that the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine is a dangerous and toxic substance:
.

“The report is a bombshell. The vaccine was launched in mid-December 2020. By the end of February 2021, “Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.”

The data from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 unequivocally confirms “Manslaughter”. Based on the evidence, Pfizer had the responsibility to immediately cancel and withdraw the “vaccine”.

Pfizer’s Covid 19 Vaccine constitutes a Criminal Act. From a legal standpoint it is an “Act of Murder” applied Worldwide to a target population of 8 billion people.”

Source: Pfizer Confidential Report, click to enlarge

Click here to read the Confidential Pfizer report. (Now in the public domain)


Video: Pfizer’s “Secret” Report on the Covid Vaccine. Beyond Manslaughter. The Evidence is Overwhelming. The Vaccine Should Be Immediately Withdrawn Worldwide 

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, March 06, 2023


 

Concluding Remarks

From the outset, the BBC has relentlessly spread disinformation on the Covid MRNA vaccine, despite ample evidence of its devastating health impacts.

Media disinformation coupled with censorship not to mention government coercion have resulted in a vaccine related upward trend in mortality and morbidity starting in early 2021. 

It should be noted that the mainstream media have instructed their personnel to get vaccinated, or else.

Media propaganda including the BBC’s frivolous reports quoting “fake science” and waging a smear campaign against prominent scientists and medical doctors: Is it a criminal undertaking?

The media had the responsibility to inform the public that the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine is  “a dangerous and toxic substance”. If the truth had been revealed, the upward movement in vaccine related deaths and injuries would not have occurred. 

Our Thoughts Are with the Victims of the COVID-19 Vaxx.

I would suggest to Gareth Eve, that he should not only confront Astra-Zeneca and the British Health authorities but also the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) which from the very outset of the Covid Crisis in January 2020 has deliberately misled public opinion on behalf of Big Pharma.

For more details on the corona crisis and the mRNA vaccine, download my book (E-Book, pdf format, 15 chapters)

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Featured image is from Children’s Health Defense


The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity

by Michel Chossudovsky

Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.

“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”

ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0,  Year: 2022,  PDF Ebook,  Pages: 164, 15 Chapters

Price: $11.50 Get yours for FREE! Click here to download.

We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page


Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research


About the author:

Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of Global Research. He has undertaken field research in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific and has written extensively on the economies of developing countries with a focus on poverty and social inequality. He has also undertaken research in Health Economics (UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), UNFPA, CIDA, WHO, Government of Venezuela, John Hopkins International Journal of Health Services (1979, 1983) He is the author of 13 books including The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order (2003), America’s “War on Terrorism” (2005), The Globalization of War, America’s Long War against Humanity (2015). He is a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His writings have been published in more than twenty languages. In 2014, he was awarded the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his writings on NATO’s war of aggression against Yugoslavia. He can be reached at [email protected]

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]