-Can this union replace the League of Arab States? Moreover, the CCASG has proved itself as the most influential force in the Arab world during the “Arab spring”. The League of Arab States moves to the second place, by giving leadership to the Cooperation Council.
-It is the CCASG countries that supported the NATO decision on introducing a non-fly zone over Libya and on starting military operations in the country. In particular, the UAE and Qatar assigned its air forces and funded military operations along with NATO.
-The key factor which laid the foundation of development of economic relations between the Gulf countries and the West is naturally huge resources of hydrocarbons in these countries. The West and the US in particular has always pursued strategic goals in relations with the monarchies of the Gulf possessing almost half of the world’s oil reserves.
-[H]aving concentrated in its arms huge and increasing capital and having won the support of the US from which the Council countries buy huge amounts of military equipment and arms, the union of Arab monarchies may become the decisive force not only in the region but also in bigger territory.
The political life of the last year remained in our memory as the chain of revolutions of the so-called “Arab spring”. They occupied almost the entire agenda of 2011. However, along with them, the Arab world has witnessed other important events.
Undoubtedly, one of the principal ones in late 2011 was Saudi Arabia’s proposal to the Arab countries – members of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (CCASG) – to transform this organization from the Cooperation Council into a Union.
The Saudi Arabian king made this proposal at the CCASG summit on December 19-20. He explained his initiative as a result of the difficult political situation and the serious external threat to security in the region, referring to Iran and its political ambitions.
One could have guessed about Saudi Arabian monarch’s concerns about the worsening of the situation in Iraq after the withdrawal of U.S troops and strengthening of the Shiite impact in the country.
The special commission will consider the details of a possible union, consisting of three representatives from each country. The commission will be set up in February. It will begin to work out the details of creating a single currency and implement other details of the Saudi Arabian project.
The establishment of the Union of the Arab States of the Gulf first involves the introduction of a common currency, the abolition of tariff barriers in mutual trade, the creation of a unified army and economic integration. So, this is the Arabic version of the European Union.
Can this union replace the League of Arab States? Moreover, the CCASG has proved itself as the most influential force in the Arab world during the “Arab spring”. The League of Arab States moves to the second place, by giving leadership to the Cooperation Council. Its countries have relatively painless experienced revolutionary upheavals in neighboring countries.
The initiative of transforming the CCASG into the union is explained by another important factor. Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been trying to be regional leaders for a long time. It should be noted that they do it quite well.
Relatively stable domestic situation in the CCASG countries made it possible for the Council to take leading position in the Arab world. A striking example for this is taking difficult and ***responsible*** moves during events in Libya. It is the CCASG countries that supported the NATO decision on introducing a non-fly zone over Libya and on starting military operations in the country. In particular, the UAE and Qatar assigned its air forces and funded military operations along with NATO.
CCASG members also took part in the settlement of Yemen crisis…Amidst all this, the LAS, which tried to strengthen its influence in the settlement of regional crises and tries currently to establish order in Syria, doesn’t look very good. Moreover, observers of the League in Syria didn’t achieve concrete results. As a result, the LAS lost credit with protesting Syrians and was blamed by Damascus for non-having concrete positions on the Syrian question.
On the other hand an important matter for transformation of the CCASG into a union is the economic factor and relations with the West.
The key factor which laid the foundation of development of economic relations between the Gulf countries and the West is naturally huge resources of hydrocarbons in these countries. The West and the US in particular has always pursued strategic goals in relations with the monarchies of the Gulf possessing almost half of the world’s oil reserves.
The CCASG commits itself to maintaining stability in the world’s oil market, in particular the energy security of the US. Washington in its turn pledges itself to ensure support of ruling monarchical regimes and preserve security in the Gulf region.
The CCASG countries have recently started to pursue a course of decreasing dependence of their economies on the oil sector. Thus, in the UAE the non-oil sector is 70 percent and in Bahrain it is 80 percent.
Thus, having concentrated in its arms huge and increasing capital and having won the support of the US from which the Council countries buy huge amounts of military equipment and arms, the union of Arab monarchies may become the decisive force not only in the region but also in bigger territory.
And if such a union in established we can witness an integration union, which concentrated huge financial and energy resources in its arms and will be seriously influencing world politics.
Stop NATO e-mail list home page with archives and search engine:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopnato/messages
Stop NATO website and articles:
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com
To subscribe for individual e-mails or the daily digest, unsubscribe, and otherwise change subscription status:
[email protected]
