The Two Faces of the Olympics

Olympics double standards? Russian and Belarusian athletes are barred from the Paris games while genocidal Israel gets a free pass and Chinese athletes get bullied in broad daylight. It is no wonder the event is being called ‘the worst Olympics ever.’

The Olympics are celebrated as a politics-free international sporting event that unites people from all corners of the globe. In reality, however, politics have always cast a shadow over the games, marked by scandals, protests, and boycotts – and in the cases of previous hosts Russia and China, accusations of “sportswashing.”

This year, the political undertones are particularly pronounced, with deeply unsettling double standards applied to Israel.

Athletes from Russia and Belarus are excluded from participating in the Paris Games under their national flags because of their part in the Ukraine conflict. They can take only part under a neutral banner. But despite Tel Aviv’s live-streamed genocide taking place in Gaza for the past ten months, no Israeli athletes have been barred from participating under the occupation state’s flag.

Worldwide calls for excluding Israel from this year’s Olympics have fallen on deaf ears. This, despite the fact that in January the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found it is “plausible” that Israel is guilty of violating the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

The following month, Amnesty International assessed that “Israel has failed to take even the bare minimum steps to comply” with the ICJ’s orders to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risks of genocide.

In May, International Criminal Court (ICC) Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan announced that he had requested arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoaz Gallant on charges of crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza.

The ICJ, which is the UN’s top court, also reaffirmed in an advisory opinion last month that Israel’s control of Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem amounts to Apartheid.

Ignoring Mountains of Evidence

Despite the substantial evidence of Israel being a rogue actor that flagrantly violates basic tenants of international law, International Olympic Committee (IOC) president Thomas Bach rejected a request from the Palestine Olympic Committee (POC) to ban Israel from participating in the games.

undefined

Bach with Israeli President Isaac Herzog in Tel Aviv, Israel, 21 September 2022 (Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0)

The POC’s letter to the IOC president stressed that “Palestinian athletes, particularly those in Gaza, are denied safe passage and have suffered significantly due to the ongoing conflict.” But Bach replied that he refuses to be pulled into “political business.”
French President Emanuel Macron also opposed barring Israel, even as voices like Thomas Portes, a member of the French parliament from the left-wing La France Insoumise, argued that Israel should face the same sanctions as Russia and Belarus.

Speaking at a rally last week, Portes declared that the Israeli delegation “is not welcome in Paris” and that “Israeli sportspeople are not welcome at the Paris Olympic Games.” The lawmaker added:

“France’s diplomats should pressure the International Olympic Committee to bar the Israeli flag and anthem, as is done for Russia.”

There was a predictable backlash against Portes for his statements, although other French legislators such as Aurelien Le Coq, Jerome Legavre, and Manuel Bompard came to Portes’ defense.

To put Israeli crimes into perspective, the Israeli military has been responsible for at least 39,363 deaths and approximately 90,923 injuries in less than ten months. Among the death toll are at least 15,000 children. In a shocking report published in the scientific journal The Lancet on 5 July, physicians and public health expert estimated that Israel’s assault on Gaza could lead to between 149,000 and 598,000 Palestinian deaths if it were to end immediately.

Today, much of Gaza is a no-man’s land. In comparison, according to the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, the civilian death toll in the first two years of the Ukraine war reached 10,582. While the outrage over human suffering in Ukraine is justified, it is challenging to argue that Russia and Belarus deserve to be barred, but Israel does not.
As Dr. Assal Rad, a scholar of Modern Middle East History tells The Cradle:

“The irony is that Israel is ‘singled out’ in its ability to act with impunity. Israel’s crimes in Gaza are brutal and extensive, including plausible genocide—the worst possible crime against humanity—yet Israel has faced zero consequences. To the contrary, the US has provided more weapons and funds for Israel to continue committing atrocities despite global outrage. In doing so, the US has shown the futility of the international system by making it a tool of power rather than justice or fairness.”

‘Olympic Values’ or Western Values?

The Olympic Charter emphasizes that the games are intended to promote a way of life based on “respect for internationally recognized human rights and universal fundamental ethical principles.” Allowing Israel to participate makes a mockery of this charter.

Excluding Israel from the Olympic Games because it is an apartheid state would not be without historic precedent. Apartheid South Africa’s infringement of the Olympic Charter resulted in the country being barred from participating in the games in 1964 and 1968, prior to being entirely expelled in 1970. In 1972, the IOC barred the team representing Rhodesia before its exclusion in 1976.

The IOC’s unwillingness to hold Israel to the same standards applied to other countries speaks to “western hypocrisy at its finest,” Ghada Oueiss, a Lebanese journalist, tells The Cradle.

Dr. Dr Rad adds:

“Western double standards have been on full display for the world to see over the last nearly 10 months as Israel has been given total impunity in its war on Gaza. The decision to ban Russia and Belarus while allowing Israel to compete is yet another example of this hypocrisy.”

“Whatever your views on politics and sports or banning athletes from competition, what is at issue here is that the rules do not apply equally across the board. Russia is ‘held accountable’ because it is an adversary of the United States, while Israel is held to a different standard because it is an ally. These double standards contribute to undermining the very systems the West so often champions with its words but not its deeds.”

‘Ekecheiria’

The Paris Olympics opened on 26 July with a controversial grand ceremony performance that was widely perceived as mocking religious beliefs. The scene in question featured drag queens and a tableau some interpreted as a parody of Leonardo da Vinci’s “The Last Supper.” Organizers denied this interpretation, claiming instead that the scene depicted was inspired by Greek mythology to celebrate diversity and French gastronomy.

This portrayal sparked outrage and condemnation from various religious leaders and groups worldwide. Egypt’s esteemed Al-Azhar, called the performance “insulting” and “barbaric,” warning against using global events to normalize insults to religion and promote what they termed “destructive societal diseases.”

The Coptic Orthodox Church also condemned the performance, describing it as a “serious insult” to Christian beliefs and calling for a formal apology from the organizers​. Additional criticisms came from the Middle East Council of Churches, the Assembly of Catholic Ordinaries of the Holy Land, and the Muslim Council of Elders.

In response to the backlash, the organizers of the Paris 2024 Olympics issued an apology to those offended, insisting that the intention was not to show disrespect but to promote community tolerance and inclusion.

Yet talk of “inclusion” or “exclusion” appear to be incredibly subjective at the IOC – allowing an apartheid state like Israel to compete in the prestigious event, while excluding a UN Security Council permanent member state.

On the same day as the opening ceremony, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres urged all countries “to lay down their arms” and respect the Olympic Truce’s spirit.

The Olympic Truce (ekecheiria) is an ancient Greek tradition which the IOC renewed in 1992 and has been reaffirmed in UN General Assembly resolutions. It demands that all hostilities around the world cease seven days prior to the Olympic and Paralympic Games, and do not resume until at least seven days after the event concludes.
But for the orphaned, starved, displaced, widowed, dismembered, and traumatized people of Gaza, Guterres’ lofty rhetoric about “peace for all” could not be more disconnected from their daily struggles as Israel’s high-tech slaughter makes the enclave uninhabitable.

That the IOC has demonstrated its indifference to Palestinian lives is the merely the latest reminder of the international community’s failure to defend Palestinians. It is a depressing commentary on the IOC that after nearly ten months of Israel’s criminal conduct in Gaza, its athletes can arrive in Paris and compete under the Israeli flag as if they represent a normal country.

While the IOC refuses to uphold its own tradition of ekecheiria, that burden has fallen on athletes and spectators attending the Paris Games – one they have carried well – with reports of athletes withdrawing from matches against Israeli opponents, players being booed and anthems jeered.

Nothing less should suffice at these Paris games, which has already been branded online as “the worst Olympics ever.”

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Spread the Truth, Refer a Friend to Global Research 

Featured image is from The Cradle


Articles by: Giorgio Cafiero

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]