Trump or Blinken – That Is the Question. Will the Dems Pull a Last Minute Wild Card? So, the fight will be fierce from now to November 6, 2024

Region:
Theme:

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Give Truth a Chance. Secure Your Access to Unchained News, Donate to Global Research.

***

Last night’s (June 27, 2024) debate between President Joe Biden and Presidential contender, Donald Trump, was according to most media-outlets a ridiculous disaster. President Biden appeared to be totally lost and maybe only partially aware on where he was and what he was doing. It left the Dems in panic mode. At least those who have no clue, who have been kept in the dark by their own party.

They have been told, “We are gonna win in November, and Joe Biden is our candidate”. His popularity has been faked by statistics, so the less informed would go along supporting somebody who had lost the capacity of thinking straight. And that for the Presidency of the United States – the Hegemon-in-Chief.

The ”thinkers” of the Dems Party have probably prepared a plot – a secret plan – worked out for years already to have a chance to beat Donald Trump in preventing a hypothetical case, where electronic cheating of the vote-counting doesn’t fully work for them.

It is well possible that the Dems will pull a last minute wild card, just before or during the Democratic National Convention (DNC) – 19-22 August 2024 in Chicago – and propose an alternative candidate to Joe Biden, one well-versed in international and national affairs, internationally quite popular, especially with Israel’s Chief Zionist, Netanyahu – for example, current Secretary of State, Antony Blinken.

Secretary Blinken would have a fair chance to come close to beat Donald Trump, possibly close enough so that the missing “percentages” could be easily manufactured in favor of Blinken. He is a Globalist, Jew, and Zionist – and trusted ally of Zionist Israel, the country that really runs the United States.

It is widely believed that (other than Israel), Blinken is really running the White House, and former President Obama may also be there in a prominent advisory role.

Some people have mentioned Michelle Obama as a last minute shoe-in at the DNC. Frankly, that appears less likely, as she may be popular mostly with women but overall stands a lesser chance because of her lack of on-the-ground experience.

Stepping back a few years, let us look at the real count of the 2020 elections, when Donald Trump was the real winner by a landslide, some people talk about at least two-thirds of all the votes. Some may also remember the “blackout” for several hours, when there was no vote-counting reporting in the night from Tuesday, November 3 to Wednesday, November 4, 2020.

That is when the fraud happened – in one way or another (with lost mail-in votes and highly sophisticated electronic voting-boot manipulations; but this is yet another story) – and in the morning the results were suddenly turned around. From an ever-increasing lead of Donald Trump in the evening of November 3, to his sudden defeat by Joe Biden, with an electoral vote count of 306 to 232; and a 4-point margin in favor of Biden in the popular vote in the morning of November 4. See this.

In fact, in “real terms” and by Real Law, as opposed to the Globalists “rules-based order”, Donald Trump is still President and Commander-in-Chief of the United States of America.

However, under no circumstances could the Globalist elite, aka the US Democrats, let a non-Globalist President run the Empire. By the way, these same rules apply to Europe. A large proportion of so-called socialists and “greens” have sold their soul to the devil, or you may call it, the Globalists, those being directed by the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Klaus Schwab and the dark forces behind the WEF’s Great Reset, as well as the WEF-allied United Nations (UN) with its Agenda 2030, and its illustrious 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) – which in reality hide the true agenda of destroying humanity as we know it.

No way could these “nameless” elites tolerate a non-Globalist in the White House, or God forbid at the head of the European Union. Leaders who think nationalist, like Donald Trump – MAGA (Make America Great Again) or Hungary’s PM, Viktor Orban, MEGA (Make Europe Great Again, meaning each one of the European countries), are a no-go.

So, the fight will be fierce from now to November 6, 2024 – Presidential Elections, lies and manipulations of the dark forces, no holds barred. In Europe, the neoliberal corrupt Ursula von der Leyen has just been reappointed for another five years – though the European Parliament still must rubber-stamp her appointment. That may happen early next week.

A seemingly unrelated matter but since everything is connected, the relation is there as we see, could change the entire monstrous game-plan.

Depending on Russia’s reaction to the recent NATO coordinated and guided missile attack by a US-made ATACMS multiple cluster bomb on a Sebastopol beach, killing 5, and possibly injuring as many as 150 people – the world’s macro-balance may change, on relative short-notice.

Russia’s Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, has warned Washington, as well as the US Ambassador to Moscow, that the responsibility of this “deliberate missile strike against the civilian population of Sebastopol, lies primarily with Washington, which supplies this weapon to Ukraine, as well as with the Kiev Regime, from whose territory this strike was launched. Such actions will not go unanswered.”

Mr. Putin’s patience has been running thin already for a while. It is possible that this provoking attack has crossed the red line for good.

What Russia’s reaction may be, is at this point anybody’s guess. But nuclear is not excluded.

It could be a tactical nuclear attack on several key European / NATO adversary “provocateurs”, London, Paris, Frankfurt, and even Washington and New York – all simultaneously. “Tactical”- to avoid civilian casualties to the extent possible, yet, to knock out vital infrastructure and financial centers, where much of the western funding for the Ukraine war is coming from.

This is, of course sheer speculation. However, if such retribution – or similar – should be Russia’s reaction, the world’s power balance as we know it, may forever change.

Let us hope a nuclear attack will not happen. But if it does, it would certainly be the West’s responsibility.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020).

Peter is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is also a non-resident Senior Fellow of the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University, Beijing.

Featured image is from countercurrents.org


Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research


Articles by: Peter Koenig

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]