President Calls for Militarization of Disaster Relief

Remarks during Briefing on Hurricane Rita: Video and Transcript:

By President George W. Bush
Global Research, September 25, 2005
White House 25 September 2005
Region:
Theme:
In-depth Report:

We are bringing to the consideration of our readers the text of Bush’s remarks at a press briefing at San Antonio, Texas,  following his visit to NorthCom Headquarters on 23-24 September 2005.

During his stay at NorthCom, a major meeting of top Bush Adminstration officials was held together with America’s top military brass. 

Participating in the meeting (through video conference) were Don Rumsfeld, Michael Chertoff and  the head of FEMA Thad Allen.

This important meeting was barely acknowledged by the media.

Bush points to a national disaster of a particular size, in which the Military could become “the lead agency in coordinating and leading the response effort”. Implied in that statement is the militarisation of disaster relief and the subordination of federal, state and mincipal (civlian) institutions by the Military. 

Global Research Editor, 25 Sept 2005 

Remarks by President Bush During Briefing on Hurricane Rita
Sunday September 25, 11:04 am ET

CNN Video of Pres. Bush’s statement
click below:
 
http://edition.cnn.com/video/politics/2005/09/25/bush.disaster.sot.cnn/content.exclude.html

Transcript below


The following is a transcript of remarks by President Bush During Briefing on Hurricane Rita.

7:35 A.M. CDT, 25 Sept 2005

President’s Remarks During Hurricane Rita Briefing

Source: White House
Randolph Air Force Base
San Antonio, Texas

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, having said that about Katrina, there were still some amazingly heroic efforts in pulling people off roofs. I don’t know how many sorties were flown — there must have been thousands of sorties.

GENERAL WHITE: As I left last Wednesday, it was close to 18,000 sorties flown. Now, sir, that includes every agency, and it’s a lot of the airlift in there, too.

THE PRESIDENT: Your point is, on a Katrina, had there been a better coordinated effort between Guard choppers — Coast Guard choppers, regular army choppers, it would have been less dangerous?

GENERAL WHITE: It would have been a better orchestrated plan. You wouldn’t have seen a lot of — for instance, one of the things that we’ve learned out of that — we had someone that needed to be rescued, and that comes up on the net. Five helicopters show up at the same place to get one person. That’s the sort of simplistic thing we’d like to avoid, and we’re not maximizing the use of our forces to best efficiency.

Certainly, that was a train wreck that we saw in New Orleans, and I know everybody is jumping in, trying to help at one time, and that’s the right thing to do. But if we can have a national plan that would address the search and rescue at this magnitude, is what we’re out to try to do.

GENERAL MAYES: Sir, if I might add, I would say that it wouldn’t necessarily make it less dangerous. I would tell you the professionalism and the plan came together. I believe that all participants would agree that with the fog that we had, and the weather that we were battling, nighttime, all the things that went into that environment, that I’m not sure we can make it less dangerous. There may be a factor there, but the main point would be, with a national plan, we’ll have a quicker jump-start, and an opportunity to save more people. That would be my input there.

GENERAL CLARK: A national plan, good training against the plan, gets you to this state faster in extremis. And that’s the goal.

THE PRESIDENT: Part of the reason I’ve come down here, and part of the reason I went to NORTHCOM, was to better understand how the federal government can plan and surge equipment, to mitigate natural disasters. And I appreciate very much, General, your briefing, because it’s precisely the kind of information that I’ll take back to Washington to help all of us understand how we can do a better job in coordinating federal, state and local response.

The other question, of course, I asked, was, is there a circumstance in which the Department of Defense becomes the lead agency. Clearly, in the case of a terrorist attack, that would be the case, but is there a natural disaster which — of a certain size that would then enable the Defense Department to become the lead agency in coordinating and leading the response effort. That’s going to be a very important consideration for Congress to think about. (Italics added)
 
Copyright White House, 2005

The original source of this article is White House
Copyright © President George W. Bush, White House, 2005

Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]