Remote Control of the Human Brain, Crowd Control Technologies. High Risk AI Systems. Can We Preserve Democracy and Human Rights? Mojmir Babacek

In the year 2000 the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) panel of the European Parliament published a study entitled “Crowd Control Technologies” where it wrote:

“in October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals… The most controversial non-lethal crowd control and anti-materiel technology proposed by the US are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behaviour in a variety of unusual ways… the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system… The research undertaken to date both in the US and in Russia can be divided into two related areas: (i) individual mind control and (ii) crowd control” (pg.liii). 

Directed energy system was further defined in the technical annex as „Directed energy weapon system designed to match radio frequency source to interfere with human brain activity at synapse level, with the note:

“Highly classified program and hard data is difficult to access” (pg. 67).

In the 1990’s, the USA were constructing the radar system HAARP, which according to the book by Nick Begich and Jeanne Maning “Angels Don’t Play this HAARP”, can be used to control the activity of human brains in large areas of the planet.

After the publication of the book,  the European Parliament held a special hearing, where the co-author of the book Nick Begich was testifying. As a result of his testimony the European Parliament adopted a resolution, where it called “for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings (paragraph 30). Against possible expectations, the European media did not publish and explain this call. The evident reason was that weapon systems “designed to match radio frequency source to interfere with human brain activity at synapse level” were “highly classified” or in other words qualified as information related to national defense.

On December 9, 2023, 23 years after this publication, the press service of the European parliament informed about a “political deal with the Council on a bill to ensure AI in Europe is safe, respects fundamental human rights, while businesses can thrive and expand”. It stated:

“recognising the potential threat to citizens’ rights and democracy posed by certain applications of AI, the co-legislators agreed to prohibit: … AI systems that manipulate human behaviour to circumvent their free will”.

As well it declared:

“for AI systems classified as high-risk (due to their significant potential harm to health, safety, fundamental rights, environment, democracy and the rule of law), clear obligations were agreed“. 

However so far the EU did not publish the fact that mass manipulation of the activity of human brains at distance is actually feasible. As well it did not ban the use of directed or radio frequency weapons to remotely manipulate the activity of nervous systems of individuals or masses of people.

In the meantime the competition between the USA, Russia and lately China for the control of  brain activity of world population by means of those weapons went on. In June 2023 the Washington Times wrote:

China’s People’s Liberation Army is developing high-technology weapons designed to disrupt brain functions and influence government leaders or entire populations, according to a report by three open-source intelligence analysts. The weapons can be used to directly attack or control brains using microwave or other directed energy weapons in handheld guns or larger weapons firing electromagnetic beams, adding that the danger of  China’s brain warfare weapons prior to or during a conflict is no longer theoretical“. 

Already in the year 1997 the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College wrote:

“Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as ‘potential’ or ‘active’, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor and focus psychological campaigns for each.” (pg. 24-25).

In this text the technology of “personality simulations” was not disclosed, but from the text it is obvious that directed energy or radio frequency weapons are supposed to be used. Does not this publication propose establishment of the USA as a new totalitarian superpower, which will be hardly possible to defeat?

Commander Cornelis van der Klaauw from Royal Netherlands Navy, and Expert from Strategic Communications and Information Operations NATO Joint Warfare Centre, wrote in an article in 2023:

“The reason why cognitive attacks go unnoticed by their targets is that cognitive activities bypass the conscious mind and directly target the subconscious of a person… most of our decisions are made by our subconscious… Cognitive attacks are aimed at exploiting emotions rooted in our subconscious, bypassing our rational conscious mind”.

As a result we are living in the world, where democratic states base their ideology on the policy of human rights defence, but at the same time they keep in secret the weapons which can be used to eliminate human rights and abolish even the right to freedom of thought and consequently the democracy itself, since the voters behaviour can be controlled by governments at the time of elections. For as long as those weapons are not declassified, there will be no guarantee, that they will not be used against citizens and that democracy will remain a ruling political system in the western world.

Modern neurotechnologies have been applied to individuals since the 1990s. Already in the year 1999 the Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin wrote in the book “Psychotronic weapon and security of Russia”, that psychotronic war “is actually taking place without declaration of war” .

In the May 2024 the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security was holding a hearing entitled “Silent weapons: Examining foreign anomalous health incidents, targeting Americans in the homeland“, where classification of those weapons and their use against the U.S. diplomats, security officers and ordinary citizens (Havana syndrome) was discussed.

The world media did not fully inform the general public about this hearing. In this way they continue avoiding the subject of abuse of fundamental human rights and human freedom by modern neurotechnologies and  cooperate on the liquidation of those democratic values in the future of this civilization.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Get Your Free Copy of “Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War”! 

Mojmir Babacek was born in 1947 in Prague, Czech Republic. Graduated in 1972 at Charles University in Prague in philosophy and political economy. In 1978 signed the document defending human rights in  communist Czechoslovakia „Charter 77“. Since 1981 until 1988 lived in emigration in the USA. Since 1996 he has published articles on different subjects mostly in the Czech and international alternative media.

In 2010, he published a book on the 9/11 attacks in the Czech language. Since the 1990s he has been striving to help to achieve the international ban of remote control of the activity of the human nervous system and human minds with the use of neurotechnology.


Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research


Articles by: Mojmir Babacek

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]