Masking and Microns. A Virus can Easily “Squeeze Through” the Pores of A Surgical Mask

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

***

For a mask to work, it needs to filter out particles.  

This requires that the pore size of the mask be smaller than the particles it is filtering.  It also requires a tight fit: no leaks.  If there is a bit of a charge on the mask that repels particles, as intended with new N95 masks, all the better.

See the particle size comparison in the diagram below:

Coronavirus: 0.1μm (the speck on the far left)

Pore size of N95: 0.1 -0.3 μm (0.1-0.3 microns)

Pore size of standard surgical mask: 0.3-10 μm

As you can see from the picture, aerosolized coronaviruses can easily squeeze through the pores in a surgical mask, which may have a diameter 100 times larger than a single virus.

But the bigger issue is the leaks–the masks don’t fit snugly.  It is almost impossible to both get a tight fit and be comfortable in a properly worn mask for more than a few minutes.

So instead we are wearing leaky masks that stop spit but don’t stop aerosolized viruses.  What was told to the public early in the pandemic (and buried later) is that all the mask really does is stop you spitting at other people.  It does not help the wearer much.  Taking it on and off is a big contamination risk.

Remember the anthrax letters.  Spores escaped through several layers of paper because the pores in the paper and envelopes were more than ten times larger than the diameter of the spores. The pores in the paper were as big as that boulder on the right, the same size as the pores in surgical masks.  And coronaviruses are only one tenth as large as anthrax spores.  Uh oh.

Wearing a mask outdoors is a joke.

Wearing a mask indoors–well, if you want to be serious about masking, get yourself some N95 masks, get fit-tested, and use a new one each time you put it on.  That is a good strategy.  The rest is mostly wishful thinking.

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from Ecotextile news


Articles by: Dr. Meryl Nass

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]