Global Research

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

*** 

The latest updates on the “new normal” – chronicling the lies, distortions, and abuses by the Public Health™ authorities.

Per internal Pfizer documents forced into the public domain by court decree, we know now that the company knew way back in April 2021 of the risks its mRNA gene therapy posed to infants.

Via Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review:

“[Pfizer’s] safety database was searched for all BNT162b2 vaccine cases reporting any exposure to vaccine during pregnancy (mother and/or baby) or exposure to baby via lactation from all time through 28 February 2021. A search of the Pfizer safety database identified 673 case reports. …

Of the 673 case reports identified in the search, 458 involved BNT162b2 exposure during pregnancy (mother/fetus) and 215 involved exposure during breast-feeding…

In 174 of the 215 reports, there was no AE reported other than ‘Exposure via breast milk/maternal exposure during breast feeding’. In the remaining 41 cases, AEs were reported in the infants following BNT162b2 exposure via lactation.”

Doing some quick math, this means that Pfizer documented adverse effects in no less than 19% of the babies – almost 1 in 5 — that it observed to be exposed to the spike proteins produced by their mRNA shot.

None of these findings, of course, were voluntarily disclosed by Pfizer, the Public Health™ authorities, or the corporate state media that the biomedical state effectively owns.

To this very day, as a matter of fact, the CDC recommends that all pregnant women get shot up, as does the legacy media.

“On Tuesday, the WHO issued an alert that there had been a rise in ‘severe myocarditis’ in newborns and infants between June 2022 and March 2023 in Wales and England,” per The Epoch Times.

Via World Health Organization:

“On 5 April 2023, the National IHR Focal Point for the United Kingdom informed WHO of an increase in severe myocarditis in neonates and infants associated with enterovirus infection in Wales compared with 2021. Between June 2022 and March 2023, 15 neonates and young infants presented with a picture consistent with neonatal sepsis in Wales and Southwest England. Enterovirus Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing of nine cases confirmed the presence of either coxsackie B3 or coxsackie B4. As of 20 April 2023, three patients were hospitalized, four patients were being managed as outpatients and two had died.”

Enterovirus, unlike mRNA manipulation for pregnant women, is nothing new. It is also not uncommon at all. Yet, in the same report, the WHO concedes that only one case of infant myocarditis in the same region was identified in the previous six years.

So, all of a sudden, apropos of nothing, infants magically develop a surge in myocarditis due to enterovirus?

That’s how The Science™ works.

WHO head warns of ‘even deadlier pandemic’ coming

WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus appeared at the United Nations to issue a biomedical threat couched as a humanitarian warning:

“The end of COVID-19 as a global health emergency is not the end of COVID-19 as a global health threat.
The threat of another variant emerging that causes new surges of disease and death remains, and the threat of another pathogen emerging with even deadlier potential remains.”

What does this little weasel know that the public doesn’t? And why is he not under investigation by the International Criminal Court for making terroristic threats?

Does he know some inside baseball on the clandestine US biolabs scattered across the world, including in the active warzone of Ukraine?

First-Ever COVID vaxx injury lawsuits takes off

The COVID vaxx manufacturers Pfizer, Moderna, et al. are – illegitimately, in my view – immune from any liability for damages caused to people who took their experimental gene therapies.

But the government actors who collude with them are not immune from violating the First Amendment by censoring COVID “misinformation.”

Via the New Civil Liberties Alliance:

“[NCLA] filed a lawsuit challenging the federal government’s ongoing efforts to work in concert with social media companies and the Stanford Internet Observatory’s Virality Project to monitor and censor online support groups catering to those injured by Covid vaccines…

The Plaintiffs have all been heavily censored on social media for sharing their personal experiences, exchanging advice, medical research, and support with others who were medically harmed after taking the vaccine. For posting about their personal experiences and trying to connect with others in the vaccine-injured community, Plaintiffs’ speech has repeatedly been flagged as misinformation or removed entirely. Their social media accounts are at constant risk of being frozen or disabled just for engaging with other users in private support groups open only to vaccine-injured individuals and sharing perspectives the government deems misinformation.

Even if they were spreading false information, under the First Amendment the federal government plays no role in policing these Plaintiffs’ private speech or picking winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas. Nor may the government induce, encourage, or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish—that is, censor truthful speech about vaccine injuries. But that is just what the federal government has been doing as it chips away at the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech and replaces it with government-induced censorship.”

The named defendants include:

• White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre
• Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra
• White House Digital Director for the COVID-19 Response Team Clark Humphrey
• Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas
• Joseph Biden

Former Biden press secretary and current MSNBC news actor Jen Psaki wasn’t shy in her former position about directing the censorship campaign directly from the presidential podium. Their hubris demonstrates how far down the tyrannical rabbit hole we’ve fallen.

The unconstitutionality is patently obvious. Given that, the real question for those of us in favor of justice getting meted out good and hard have to wonder: why aren’t the feckless GOP pharma cucks in the Republican-majority House of Representatives pushing harder on this front?

Perhaps, the question answers itself.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

This article was originally published on The Daily Bell.

Ben Bartee is an independent Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs.

Featured image is from TDB

Price: $11.50 Get yours for FREE! Click here to download.

We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page.